Authors
Affiliation

I. Grypari

Athena Research Center

N. Manola

Athena Research Center

H. Papageorgiou

Athena Research Center

P. Stavropoulos

Athena Research Center

Availability of preprint repositories

History

Version Revision date Revision Author
1.1 2023-08-28 Draft for initial publication I. Grypari
1.0 2023-05-09 First draft I. Grypari, N. Manola, P. Stavropoulos, H. Papageorgiou

Description

Description:

  • The “availability of preprint repositories” indicator measures the availability and accessibility of preprint repositories that are available to researchers in a particular level of interest such as field, country or organization.

Usefulness:

  • The “availability of preprint repositories” indicator provides insight into the infrastructure and resources available to researchers for sharing their work as preprints.
  • It can help to identify areas where preprint repositories are lacking or where access to these repositories is limited, potentially hindering the adoption of preprinting practices.
  • This indicator can also be used to assess the impact of preprint repositories on scholarly communication and to identify areas where additional resources and support may be needed.

Limitations:

  • Not all fields or research areas may have a culture of preprinting, which can affect the applicability of the indicator in different contexts.
  • There may be good preprint practices in general repositories (such as Zenodo) that would not be identifiable via this indicator.

Metrics

Number of preprint repositories

Description:

  • The “number of preprint repositories” indicator measures the quantity of preprint repositories available to researchers in a particular field, country, organization, etc.

Usefulness:

  • Provides a straightforward measure of repository availability.

Limitations:

  • Does not account for the quality or size of repositories .

Measurement.

Count

Datasources
ASAPbio

ASAPbio maintains a list of preprint repositories, available from https://asapbio.org/preprint-servers.

Quality of preprint repositories

Evaluating pre-print repositories based on predetermined standards encompassing metadata consistency, user interface, search functionalities, etc.

Usefulness:

  • Differentiates repositories by the reliability and efficiency of their content and platform.

Limitation:

  • Quality standards can be subjective; high quality in one domain might not be viewed as such in another.Measurement.

Use established repository ranking or rating systems, if available. Alternatively, develop a criteria checklist and review each repository against it.

Size of pre-print repositories

Assessing the volume of content or number of publications each repository holds.

Usefulness:

  • Differentiates repositories by the reliability and efficiency of their content and platform.

Limitation:

  • Size does always correlate with relevance or quality of content, for example in terms of document types. Measurement.

Directly query the repository (if it offers such statistics) or query data bases that aggregate repositories.

Measurement.

Datasources
OpenAIRE Graph
Methodologies

To determine the size or volume of content within specific pre-print repositories in a field, country, or organization using the OpenAIRE Graph, researchers can analyze the Graph dump available on Zenodo or browse OpenAIRE EXPLORE (explore.openaire.eu). It’s crucial to understand that while the OpenAIRE Graph has integrated over 129,000 data sources, the data derived will strictly represent repositories integrated into the graph, subject to the quality of information those sources provide (https://graph.openaire.eu/docs/ can be consulted)

Accessibility of pre-print repositories

Evaluating the access model of publication repositories, specifically categorizing them as open access, subscription-based, or limited to specific users.

Usefulness:

  • Provides clarity on whether a wider audience can readily access the content of a repository or if there are restrictions.

Limitation:

  • Some repositories might switch access models over time, or have hybrid models combining elements of open and subscription-based access. Measurement.

Examine each repository’s documented access model. This can be achieved by querying databases that list repositories.

Measurement.

Datasources

OpenAIRE Graph and Directory of Open Access Repositories (DOAR) (integrated in the OpenAIRE Graph)

Methodologies

All repositories in both data sources are Open Access.

Known correlates

The availability of preprint repositories may correlate with specific fields of study, given that certain scientific disciplines are more inclined to use preprints than others. Furthermore, regional or national open science policies, funding opportunities, and research culture can also influence the presence or absence of preprint repositories in a particular country or region.

Reuse

Open Science Indicator Handbook © 2024 by PathOS is licensed under CC BY 4.0 (View License)

Citation

BibTeX citation:
@online{apartis2023,
  author = {Apartis, S. and Catalano, G. and Consiglio, G. and Costas,
    R. and Delugas, E. and Dulong de Rosnay, M. and Grypari, I. and
    Karasz, I. and Klebel, Thomas and Kormann, E. and Manola, N. and
    Papageorgiou, H. and Seminaroti, E. and Stavropoulos, P. and Stoy,
    L. and Traag, V.A. and van Leeuwen, T. and Venturini, T. and
    Vignetti, S. and Waltman, L. and Willemse, T.},
  title = {PathOS - {D2.1} - {D2.2} - {Open} {Science} {Indicator}
    {Handbook}},
  date = {2023},
  url = {https://handbook.pathos-project.eu/indicator_templates/quarto/1_open_science/availability_preprint_repositories.html},
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.8305626},
  langid = {en}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
Apartis, S., G. Catalano, G. Consiglio, R. Costas, E. Delugas, M. Dulong de Rosnay, I. Grypari, et al. 2023. “PathOS - D2.1 - D2.2 - Open Science Indicator Handbook.” Zenodo. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8305626.